Blog

Let’s Talk Compliance – Advance Ruling – In Personam Relief

The Government of India after considering the complexity of tax systems introduced De jure forum to pronounce the Advance Ruling as In Personam Relief (i.e., Relief to specific person). Advance Ruling refers to the written response or decision by “Authority for Advance Ruling” (AAR) and “Appellate authority for Advance Ruling” (AAAR). It is a legal process which helps Suo Moto applicant in planning business activities which are liable for payment of GST or not, well in advance.

Objective:

  • To provide indubitable tax liability in advance
  • To attract FDI
  • To Reduce Litigation
  • To Pronounce ruling expeditiously in a transparent and inexpensive manner

Jurisdiction of AAR & AAAR

Unlike other forums, the ruling pronounced by the AAR & AAAR will be applicable only within the jurisdiction of the concerned state or union territory as it is constituted under the provisions of State Goods and Services Tax Act or Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act and shall be deemed to be the Authority for advance ruling in respect of that State or Union territory under the CGST Act, 2017.

Powers of AAR & AAAR:

  • The AAR and AAAR have the power to regulate their own procedure.
  • Deemed to be Civil Court under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
  • Any proceeding before the authority shall be deemed to be judicial proceeding.

Though the forum has vest with the power of the Court and the proceedings are deemed to be judicial proceeding, the ruling pronounced by them does not have any precedent value as that of judgment pronounced by Supreme Court or High Court. Advance Ruling is mere like In Personam Relief as it is the proceeding in which relief is sought and is applicable only to the applicant applying for it, so it does not hold any persuasive value.

The Advance Ruling shall bind only:

  • Applicant who sought for it
  • Concerned Officer
  • Jurisdictional Officer

It will not be applicable to the homogeneous tax persons in the State. It is only limited to the person who has applied for an advance ruling.

Key points in a Capsule:

  • Questions or Appeal can be raised only u/s 97(2) or u/s 100(1) of CGST Act, 2017.
  • Advance ruling can be obtained for a proposed transaction as well as a transaction already undertaken by the appellant.
  • It shall bind till the period of the law, facts or circumstances supporting original advance ruling not changed or amended.
  • Aggrieved applicant or concerned or jurisdictional officer shall file an appeal to AAAR.
  • The Authority or the Appellate authority shall declare the ruling as void ab initio if the applicant has obtained the ruling by fraud or suppressing the material facts.
  • Advance Ruling does not hold any Persuasive value even for similar tax persons in the State.
  • It is not Judgment in Rem (Right against the world at large) but rather a Judgment in Personam i.ei.e., (binding on the applicant in respect of transaction to which ruling has been sought and on tax authorities), and not universally. 

With 20 years of experience in the Compliance Market handling thousands of Compliance issue areas across 1400 plus organisations across 44 plus industries, Aparajitha also offers a global e-compliance platform to easily track, trigger and keep you updated with your organisation’s compliance status.

With domains running across multiple domains such as Labour, Finance, Commercial, Industrial, Environmental, Health and Safety, Corporate, Secretarial and Employment laws our e- compliance platform helps your organization handle your compliance and be Audit ready through an easy dashboard and ready consolidated reports anytime!!

                                    ✍Shivadharini. SNS 

                                        CAS – FCC Team

Disclaimer: “The article represents the opinions of the author and the author is solely responsible for the facts, cases, and legal or otherwise reproduced in the article”

Previous Posts

What happens if you don’t? You’re denying them, an Indian citizen, their constitutional right to

RBI issued a circular mandating to streamline regulatory compliance for all Indian financial institutions, including

Exercising the powers conferred under Sec 4A (4) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post comment